We cross-reference your prospectuses, policy wordings, Key Features Documents, and customer terms against your Rules, internal compliance checklists, and regulator mandatory wording — then deliver a structured findings report with paragraph-level citations and, optionally, tracked-change redlines your team can sign off in hours.
Customer-facing documents have to line up with governing rules, internal checklists, mandatory regulator wording, and every other document the firm publishes.
At 100+ pages, cover-to-cover human review doesn't scale — and that's where undeclared regulatory risk accumulates.
The customer document describes a feature, fee cap, or cancellation regime that doesn’t match what the Scheme Rules, Trust Deed, or Articles of Association actually say. Often caused by copy-paste from an older version or a different product.
Regulator-prescribed warnings, fee disclosure tables, and consumer advisories are required by instrument. They get lost between template versions, and a human skim-reader won't notice absence the way a system will.
ABNs, company numbers, fund reference numbers, cover dates, and “dated dd mmmm yyyy” statements. One wrong digit on page one and you have a statutory identifier error nobody caught in three rounds of review.
A single paragraph describes a mechanism that only exists in a sibling product, silently copy-pasted from its template. Operational staff act on the customer document; reality follows the Rules. That delta is a liability.
Risk ratings in the KIID don’t match descriptions in the prospectus. Absolute capital preservation claims in marketing copy. Non-standard risk band labels that don’t exist in the regulator’s framework.
Marketing copy promotes a use case the target-market statement excludes. Tips or worked examples recommend strategies that conflict with your product-governance framework. Exactly the misalignment the regulator is watching for.
A repeatable pipeline that reads, cross-references, and reports. Your compliance team stays in charge of decisions — we just make sure nothing is missed.
We extract structured content from your PDFs and Word documents — sections, paragraphs, tables, forms — so every finding can be cited to a paragraph number.
An AI pipeline checks every claim against your Rules, internal checklists, mandatory wording, and other published documents. Multi-pass analysis catches what single-pass review misses.
A structured findings report: every issue categorised by severity, cross-referenced to the governing rule or checklist item, with paragraph-level citations your reviewers can verify in seconds.
Optional: every agreed finding implemented as tracked changes in the Word source. Clean and tracked versions delivered, ready for sign-off and publishing.
Pick the engagement model that fits how much of the work you want us to take off your desk — from a findings report to a sign-off-ready redline.
Findings report with paragraph-level citations. Your team decides what to fix.
Fixed-fee · per engagementFindings plus tracked-change implementation in your Word source. Sign-off-ready.
Fixed-fee · per engagementOngoing review as documents update and rules change.
Quarterly retainerEvery engagement is scoped to document complexity and rule-book size. We’ll quote a fixed fee in writing after a 20-minute discovery call — no obligation, no subscription.
The sweet spot: mid-sized firms with a small compliance team, a rule book that governs customer-facing content, and more documents to review than time to review them.
No. We deliver AI-assisted analysis for review by your qualified compliance team or legal counsel. Every finding is framed as a “potential misalignment identified — recommend review”, with the citation for your team to verify. We never tell you what complies or doesn’t comply. You stay in charge of every decision.
Documents are processed under a signed NDA and stored only for the duration of the engagement. AI providers operate under enterprise API terms that do not train on client inputs. We can supply a Data Processing Agreement (DPA) and confirm processing locations on request. We’re a UK limited company and can work under your firm’s standard third-party processor terms.
Customer-facing regulated documents: prospectuses, KIIDs, policy wordings, Terms of Business, Key Features Documents, client agreements, target-market statements, suitability templates, factsheets, and marketing collateral. We cross-reference them against your governing rules, internal checklists, and any mandatory regulator wording.
The AI reads, extracts, and cross-references at a scale humans can’t match without weeks of effort. Our team scopes the engagement, chooses the reference frameworks, verifies high-severity findings against source, writes the report narrative, and makes judgment calls on medium-confidence items. The AI is a force multiplier, not a decision-maker.
Two to five working days from document handover to findings report, depending on document length and reference framework complexity. Longer documents and larger rule books extend timelines accordingly — we’ll scope it in the initial call and quote a fixed fee in writing before any work starts.
Yes. We work with compliance consultancies and law firms under a back-office arrangement: you scope the engagement with your client, we deliver the analysis under your brand, and your firm retains the client relationship. Ask about white-label arrangements when you get in touch.
A 20-minute discovery call to agree scope, followed by a fixed-fee quote in writing.
No obligation, no subscription, no long sales cycle.